🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major setback for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority support, the president could potentially return the bill for additional consideration if he holds objections.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable discussions in additional member states